Letter to Parks Commission Chairperson

February 26, 2022

Emily Barkham,

Chairperson, Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC), Oakland Township

cc: PRC Commissioners, BOT

Subject: February 23rd PRC Meeting

I thought that allowing several public question and answer periods during Dr. Ben Vanderweide’s 159 slide presentation “2022 Natural Areas Stewardship Overview and Update” was extremely helpful. I hope this will set the pattern for future annual presentations and more residents will attend and ask questions about the complex Natural Areas Stewardship program. It was gratifying to see Township Trustee Dave Mabry in attendance and asking questions. Public Q&A, in my view, is a very effective way to increase public understanding of any township issue and to increase a board or commission’s understanding of the public views. Increased mutual understanding, in my view, leads to better decisions by government bodies and voters.

I also thought the round-table seating format should be considered for all meetings. It allows PRC members to hear each other better and to see each other’s expressions and body-language when communicating; which in my view,  sometimes constitutes 50% of the communication.

Bob Yager – Resident

Dr. Ben Vanderweide Gave a 159 Slide Review of Natural Areas Stewardship Work for 2021

I believe that Dr. Benjamin Vanderweide (Dr. Ben) is a major asset needed to keep Oakland Township “Rural”, as we say in our master plan, but also with restored, preserved and interconnected oak-barrens and other rare natural communities as shown on our Township Seal.  

Curamus Terram   – “We care for the land”

We must not let some other entity steal him away from us. He needs to be our sixth and final Natural Areas Stewardship Manager. But, of course, oversight of his plans and activities is required by our 20,000 community members through our elected Parks and Recreation Commission.

At the February 23rd Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, Dr. Ben (as he is called), gave an overview of Natural Areas Stewardship accomplishments in 2021. He presented 159 slides and entertained questions at frequent intervals. Natural Areas Stewardship 2022 Update and Overview (oaklandtownship.org).

The questions resulted in some good discussions. I learned a lot, as did others. I hope this will be an annual public event from now on. One thing I learned is that Dr. Ben (as he is called) has issued a detailed Annual Report every year since 2014. These reports can be found on this page https://oaklandnaturalareas.com/about/.  Scroll down a little when you arrive at that page to see a list of links to these annual reports.  You can follow the annual progress since 2014 at your favorite park.

Apparently Parks encounters some difficulties posting on the Township website so for Stewardship activities most detailed information is seen at this website: https://oaklandnaturalareas.com/

You might also be interested in the education and experience Dr. Ben brought to Oakland Township. ths following paragraph is from the 2014 annual report:

“Dr. Benjamin VanderWeide joined Oakland Township Parks in April 2014 to lead parks Natural Areas Stewardship. Ben earned his Ph.D. in Biology from Kansas State University, focusing on how fire, grazing, and drought affect prairie vegetation, and a Bachelor’s of Science from Calvin College, with majors in Biology and Spanish, and a minor in biochemistry. Ben brings practical experience doing botanical surveys and ecological restoration in the Great Lakes region, invasive species management in Idaho with the US Forest Service, and 7 years of prescribed burning in Michigan and Kansas. His science education experience includes designing and teaching high school ecology experiments and teaching biology courses at Kansas State University. He loves to help people learn about nature in their backyards, and is excited to work in Oakland Township Parks to improve their natural areas. Ben and his wife Debbie recently moved back to the beautiful state of Michigan (he is originally from Sparta, Michigan), and now spend their time exploring the area, hiking on local trails, and enjoying the Great Lakes.”

In answer to resident Dr. Drew Moore’s questions about the future plans for the recently girdled maple trees near his home, Dr. Vanderweide said he planned to leave the large ones standing to eventually become woodpecker homes for rare woodpeckers. Any that present a hazard to trail users will be removed as a result of the annual hazardous tree survey, according to Parks and Recreation Director Mindy Milos-Dale.

Below is the table of contents for the 2020 Annual Report, showing where Stewardship efforts took place.

After this presentation, Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) by a 5/0 vote approved his “2022 Field Work Plan”. Qualified as Dr. Ben is, his plans still must be approved by our elected Parks and Recreation Commission, who does our oversight for us. You can see the plan in the meeting packet here on pages 14-20 https://ecode360.com/documents/OA3183/public/646332345.pdf.

Commissioner Brian Blust questioned whether the public had sufficient time to review the plan and comment. The PRC consensus was that any resident concern about the plan can be addressed at any time.

Going through it you can see what is planned for your favorite park or other property. If you have any questions, Dr. Ben welcomes your phone calls at 248-651-7810.

With regard to one of my questions regarding the tree ordinance impact on Stewardship:

Counterintuitively, some of the work to restore natural habitat occasionally requires killing large maple trees to restore the rich biodiversity of the oak barrens that were here for centuries before European settlement suppressed fire. That original natural landscape is detailed in the 1816/17 initial land survey notes that are available to the public.

 Dr. Ben was told, when hired, that he was permitted to do such work under the tree ordinance exceptions 389-11 B and G.

389-11- B Conservation of natural resources. Conservation of soil, vegetation, water, fish, wildlife, and other natural resources.

389-11-G. Outdoor recreation. Outdoor recreation such as the utilization of field trails or woodlands on publicly owned property for nature study, hiking, horseback riding, trapping and hunting as otherwise legally permitted and regulated.

It was a great meeting format in that citizens were allowed to ask questions and get answers – and discuss further.

Each park has a maintenance plan. Some of these are ten years old need revision according to Dr. Ben. I will be following how that process unfolds – who approves what, when and how.

Among the 14 members of the public in attendance were  Stacy Sobotka, reporter for “The Record” newspaper; Dr. and Mrs. Moore who live in the former Bill Fox home, surrounded by Lost Lake Nature Park Expansion; Mrs. Moore’ parents, Trustee Dave Mabry, Reg Brown, Cam Mannino and others.

Email from Trustee Andy Zale Regarding Recent Withdrawn Resolution Concerning Lost Lake Nature Park Expansion

Dear Neighbors,

I hope you are enjoying your 2022.

During the 2/8 Board of Trustees meeting, I was prepared to share my thoughts on the proposed resolution.  However, when there is no motion to discuss I generally prefer to remain quiet to keep the meeting brief. 

I do not like the contents of the proposed resolution.  I do not wish to name the property.   I do not wish to manage the property.  I do not wish to approve individual expenditures on the property.

There seems to be some misunderstanding/disagreement regarding who should control/manage the Land Preservation Millage.  Many arguments could be made supporting the differing opinions on the matter.  Unless someone can point to a specific important problem that must be addressed, I do not believe that we need to resolve these differing opinions.  Also, I do not believe a BoT resolution will resolve this issue.

We have two millages for the purposes of purchasing and managing properties for active/passive recreation.  It seems logical to me that both millages are managed by a single group.  Because the Parks millage is managed by seven elected officials, I feel confident that they can properly manage the land preservation funds while remaining fully accountable to the citizens of Oakland Township.  Based on our recent grant successes, there are a least 5 million reasons to support my thoughts.  I do not feel that adding another layer of elected authority over Preservation Fund expenditures will serve the residents well.  Because I was previously on the Parks Board, I could speak at great lengths to describe the care and detail Parks puts into our natural areas and preservation fund expenditures.  I would strongly encourage anyone interested in land management to attend Dr. Ben Vanderweide’s presentation on Wednesday night at 7p.

Regarding BoT authority and oversight, I think most people would agree that the BoT, at minimum, has the authority to approve the budgets for both Parks and for Land Preservation.  This authority has been used to request small adjustments to budgets over the years through cooperative workshops.  I feel confident that the elected Parks Board is representing the residents well by managing the Park Fund and the Land Preservation Fund, and as a Trustee I feel that the budget approvals process is an appropriate check and balance.  

Kind regards,

Andy Zale

Rochester Community Schools Police-School Liaison Program Does Not Appear to Have the Required Annual Goal Setting and Reporting

In our investigation of the 2010 “Amended Agreement, Police-School Liaison Program”, my wife Barbara and I have found no evidence that the Executive Committee is setting goals and receiving annual progress reports as required. The Agreement was signed by the following members of an Executive Committee defined in the Agreement (Mayor of Rochester Hills, City Manager of Rochester, Township Manager of Oakland Township and Superintedent of Rochester Community Schools). Our FOIA requests to the City of Rochester and Oakland Township revealed no evidence of goal setting and/or reporting. Our FOIA request and follow-up to Rochester Community Schools went unanswered as did our FOIA appeal.

The 5 page letter below with 22 pages of attachments was sent to all government officials in all three Greater Rochester Area communities. We are asking that RCS school board lead the effort to bring planning and reporting actions in conformance with the written agreement.

See our full letter here –

Lost Lake Nature Park & Land Preservation is Only Agenda Item for Tuesday Feb. 8, Board of Trustees

Aside from approving bills and past meeting minutes the Board will only address a resolution proposed by two Board members (who?) addressing Lost Lake Nature Park. The resoluton begins on page 59 of the packet found at this link:

In the “Township Manager’s Report “on page 61, Township Manager Adam Kline says, “

The following items are scheduled for the February 8 meeting agenda:
Resolution Regarding the Financing and Approval of the MNTRF Grant Property
Improvements: Two board members requested this item be placed on the agenda for board
consideration.”